Three Ways Cannabis Filtration Can Help an Extraction Business Save Money
Want to listen to this article for FREE?
Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.
With the legalization of cannabis in many states across the USA, the concentrates market is poised for major growth. According to Data Bridge Market Research, experts expect the market will grow at a rate of 31.9 percent from 2020 to 2024, with the combined market value reaching USD $45 billion by 2024.
In more mature cannabis markets in the United States, BDSA Analytics shows that the California and Colorado markets have a significant amount of concentrate sales with 29.9 percent and 29.6 percent, respectively. With cannabis oils making up a significant amount of the market, processors are trying to keep up with demand while keeping costs down.
But how can they identify areas where they could save money? Operational expenses are always a good place to start. For example, in the extraction process – specifically, post winterization – several issues commonly increase operating costs such as:
- The long and laborious time to process out waxes or lipids, upwards of eight hours per batch.
- Product loss through processing or inefficient processes leading to breaking beakers or spillage.
- Multiple passes through equipment to remove waxes or lipids.
- Multiple passes through equipment to remove color.
Cannabis companies encountering some of these issues might consider filtration solutions to improve their process, thus enabling them to run their business at lower operating costs.
There are three ways that filtration can help save money in the extraction process for cannabis oils:
1. Time saved through filtration extraction creates more available production hours, increasing throughput and resulting revenue.
If you can increase production by 50 percent a week because you implemented or refined your filtration process, that’s 100 extra liters produced every week. In terms of revenue, that is USD $126,000 a week or more than USD $6.5 million a year if you operate 52 weeks a year.
2. The safety of leveraging good manufacturing practice (GMP) compliant products can reduce the risk of recalls or facility closures.
Hypothetical scenario: your business was just audited, and it was found that you are not GMP compliant. Your facility produces 1000 liters a day of CBD distillate, and you need to close for a month to certify your facility.
If you operate your facility for five days a week that is USD $25 million dollars you will lose in potential revenue over the course of a month; that number does not even account for product recalls, fines, or damage to your company’s reputation.
3. The ability to reduce human error and product loss from filter presses or lab scale products.
Hypothetical scenario: your business is losing one liter a day for five days a week over the course of 52 weeks through product loss (due to ineffective filter presses).
A process improvement such as leveraging an enclosed system with depth filtration modules could potentially save you a single liter, which equates to USD $325,000 a year straight to your bottom line.
Of course, total savings can differ based on the efficiency of your current process. However, the additional peace of mind knowing that you have significantly decreased the potential for operator error is priceless.
As consumer demand continues to grow, cannabis companies also want to grow profit. One of the best ways to do that is to look for solutions that can increase overall production while simultaneously reducing costs, and depth filtration with lenticular modules has the potential to help do both.
Kris Peck is a business development manager of cannabis at Pall Corporation.