We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience, read our Cookie Policy

Analytical Cannabis Logo
Home > Articles > Testing > Content Piece

Regulating Heavy Metal Contaminants in Cannabis: What Can be Learned from the Pharmaceutical Industry? Part 2

By Robert Thomas

Published: May 14, 2020   
Listen with
Register for FREE to listen to this article
Thank you. Listen to this article using the player above.

Potential sources of contamination: cultivation and growing

The first installment of this series gave an overview of why testing cannabis and hemp for heavy metal contaminants is so important and how the pharmaceutical industry can play a critical role in preparing the cannabis industry for federal oversight.

Parts two and three will focus on how growers, cultivator, processers, and manufacturers need to be actively investigating all the potential sources of elemental contamination before they can even hope to minimize them – a process the pharmaceutical industry took over 20 years to fully understand. 

The series has been summarized from two chapters in Robert Thomas’ upcoming book, Measuring Heavy Metal Contaminants in Cannabis and Hemp: A Practical Guide, which will be published by CRC Press this September. The book, including its table of contents, is now available for pre-ordering from the publisher. 

Environmental pathways

Cannabis and hemp are known to be hyper-accumulators of contaminants in the soil, which is why they’ve been used to clean up toxic waste sites where other kinds of remediation attempts have failed. In the aftermath of the Chernobyl nuclear melt down in the Ukraine in 1986, industrial hemp was planted to clean up the radioactive isotopes that had leaked into the soil and ground waters1. Of course, Chernobyl is an extreme example of heavy metal and radionuclide contamination. But as a result of several anthropogenic industrial activities over the past few decades, including mining, smelting, use of fertilizers and pesticides, and waste treatment, heavy metal pollution has become one of the most serious environmental problems today.

Considerations about where to grow cannabis and hemp is therefore going to be critically important because it could have serious implications on the level of heavy metals that are absorbed by the plant and its resulting safety for human consumption of cannabinoids. Historically, apart from the Western and Southern regions of the US, much of the cannabis in the US has been grown indoors in greenhouses under controlled growing environments, so the absorption of heavy metals into the plant has been kept in check reasonably well.

But in 2020, it’s legal to grow hemp for CBD production anywhere in the US2. As a result, it will become more challenging to keep the levels low, because most of the hemp plants will be grown outdoors on farms where the soil might be an additional source of contamination. Part two of this series of articles will look at potential sources of elemental contaminants in cannabis and hemp, from a growing and cultivation perspective, while part three will focus on the extraction, manufacturing and packaging processes.

Phytoremediation properties of cannabis and hemp

Plant-based phytoremediation is emerging as a cost-effective technology to concentrate and remove elements, compounds and pollutants from the environment3. And within this field, the use of cannabis and hemp plants to concentrate metals from the soil into the harvestable parts of roots and above-ground shoots (phytoextraction) has great potential as a viable alternative to traditional contaminated land remediation methods4. However, the natural inclination of these plants to absorb heavy metals from the soil could potentially limits its commercial use for the production of medicinal cannabinoid-based compounds. A number of studies provide convincing evidence that cannabis is an active accumulator of heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury, magnesium, copper, chromium, nickel, manganese, and cobalt5, 6, 7.

Other pathways for contamination

An added complication is that cannabis and hemp plants not only absorb heavy metals from the soil and growing medium, but also from contaminants found in fertilizers, nutrients, pesticides, and growth enhancers, as well as from other environmental pathways8, 9. Additionally, the process of cutting, grinding and preparing the cannabis/hemp flowers for extraction can often pick up elemental contaminants from the manufacturing equipment.

It should also be emphasized that the extraction/concentration process has the potential to extract/concentrate varying amounts of heavy metals, depending on the solvents and the super/sub critical extraction temperatures/pressures used. It’s therefore critically important that an optimized extraction/concentration process is carried out in order to minimize the carry-over of heavy metals, even though it might not maximize cannabinoid yield10. It’s also worth pointing out that the equipment used to package and deliver these cannabinoid products to consumers, such as inhalers, vaporizers, transdermal patches, bottles and containers can mean the user is exposed to additional sources of elemental contaminants, apart from what’s in the cannabinoid compound itself11.

Main factors for metal uptake from the growing medium

The health and growth of all plants rely on the absorption of essential nutrients and minerals being available in the dissolved, ionic form in the soil. To maintain enough water to survive and thrive, the plant’s primary means of facilitating the movement of water is through transpiration, which is a highly efficient means of drawing a concentrat­ed solution of minerals and nutrients out of the soil. Transpi­ration works by the evaporative loss of water from the shoots, which is controlled by the opening and closing of specialized pores (known as stoma­ta) embedded in the surface of the leaves that initiates gas exchange. When the stomata are open, the pressure potential of the plant becomes very negative, creat­ing a vacuum effect that draws water and nutrients into the plant, moving it from the roots to the shoots. Unfortunately, this is also the mechanism that the plant draws in heavy metal contaminants in addition to the nutrients.

The rhizosphere is the region of soil in the vicinity of plant roots in which the chemistry and microbiology is influenced by their growth, respiration, and nutrient exchange12. Unfortunately, under certain conditions the plant’s root system will preferentially absorb heavy metals over other minerals, which cannot be explained exclusively by passive ion uptake. The hyper-accumulating properties of cannabis and hemp aren’t fully understood, but are partially dependent upon other factors, including soil pH, availability of other metal/mineral ions in solution, the N/P/K (nitrogen/phosphorus/potassium) ratio and the ability of the plant’s natural metalloproteins, which act as chelating compounds to bind with the heavy metals to reduce the rate of absorption and overcome their toxic effects.

It should also be noted that the plant’s natural polyamine compounds will strengthen the defense response of plants and enhance their defense against diverse environmental stressors including toxicity, and oxidative stress. Bode wrote an excellent article on the underlying mechanisms of heavy metal uptake by cannabis plants, which should be essential reading for the cannabis grower13.

Based on evidence in the public domain, there are in the order of 15-20 heavy metals found in polluted ecosystems that could be potential sources of contaminants, including Lead, Arsenic, Mercury, Cadmium, Nickel, Vanadium, Cobalt, Copper, Selenium, Boron, Thallium, Barium, Antimony, Silver, Gold, Zinc, Tin, Manganese, Molybdenum, Tungsten, Iron, and Uranium. Many of these elements exist as different species (eg. metalloids), based on their oxidation state, organic/inorganic/ionic form14, or more recently as engineered nanoparticles that could find their way into wastewater streams15. Their levels of toxicity would need to be investigated further, but there is a compelling case to be made that the many of these elements, metalloids, and speciated forms could be the future basis of a federally-regulated panel of metal-based contaminants in cannabis and hemp.

Outdoor growing sources

Let’s take a closer look at some of the ‘real-world’ sources of elemental contaminants that are supported by evidence in the public domain. It’s only when cannabis and hemp cultivators and growers have a good understanding of this problem, can they hope to reduce or even eliminate them. This isn’t an exhaustive list, but it represents a good starting point to begin investigating these issues.

  • When gown outdoors, if possible, the soil should be characterized to make sure that the elemental contaminants are at acceptable levels. Explore the use of natural chelating agent such as humic acid or synthetic ones like biochar to bind with the harmful metallic contaminants to minimize their uptake by the plant’s root system16.
  • In areas where gold and silver mines are found, there is the potential for high mercury levels, as mercury amalgamation is a well-accepted extraction method17. These mines are particularly prevalent in the growing states of California, Oregon and Washington, which have some of the highest density of outdoor cannabis farms in the US18.
  • All metal smelting plants will experience heavy metal contamination in surrounding areas. Lead and copper ores in particular contain high levels of arsenic19.
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) superfund sites, especially those involved in the manufacture of weapons, could have high levels of heavy metal/radioisotope contaminants in the soil20.
  • Fly ash waste from coal-fired power plants is extremely high in heavy metals from the coal combustion process. Surrounding areas where the fly ash has been dumped will likely be contaminated21.
  • Decades of using leaded-gasoline has contaminated much of the soil close to and around major highways and roads22.
  • Many industries are known to emit elemental mercury into the atmosphere, including coal fired power plants, metal refineries/smelters, petrochemical plants, and cement works. It’s well documented by the Clean Air Act that approximately 100 tons of mercury are emitted by US industries annually, much of it being converted into the highly toxic methyl mercury23.
  • Wood preservation chemicals contain high levels of copper, arsenic, and chromium24. Areas around these plants are likely contaminated.
  • Low-grade fertilizers/nutrients made from phosphate rocks contain significant amounts of elemental impurities25.
  • Nickel has been promoted as a cannabis flower/bud-enhancer and silicon as a way of increasing shoot size, which means that higher levels of nickel and silicon will invariably end up in the cannabis product. These elements typically aren’t required by the vast majority of states, so they would escape the scrutiny of most state regulators26, 27.
  • Some inorganic pesticides contain arsenic, copper, lead, and mercury28.
  • Although there are no elemental species of arsenic and mercury defined in the current state-based limits for heavy metals, the pharmaceutical industry has shown that inorganic and organic forms of these elements should be monitored if the maximum limits for the total amount are exceeded. In addition, depending on where the cannabis/hemp plants are grown, will also dictate whether other speciated forms should be monitored. Examples of this might include the highly toxic hexavalent chromium (CrVI) compared to the relatively innocuous trivalent species (CrIII)29.
  • At some point in the future, nanoparticle characterization in the soil and uptake by the cannabis plant may be needed particularly when there are regulated methods for environmental and food-based assays15.


Indoor growing sources

Although an indoor or greenhouse growing environment is far more controlled than cultivating plants outdoors, there are still many opportunities for picking up elemental contaminants. Nutrients, fertilizers and potable water are three of the potential sources of metal contamination. As a result, indoors plants cultivated in a soil-based growing medium or hydroponically-grown, are highly dependent on the nutrients, minerals and water used. For that reason high quality fertilizers and a source of clean water are essential for healthy plants. Here are three possible areas of concern when growing plants indoors.

  • Last year the EPA estimated that 30 million people in the US live in areas where drinking water violated safety standards30. The EPA defines a list of primary and secondary elemental maximum contaminants levels (MCLs) in drinking water and overseas all local water authorities/municipalities in the US to ensure compliance. It’s important to know these levels in your region to make sure they are well below the limits for metal impurities (they will be posted online by your local water authority). Also keep in mind that these are levels for samples taken at the water treatment plant and not the levels measured at your home or growing site. EPA mandates that a municipality only has to measure water quality at its customers sites every two years and has to take remedial action only if 10 percent of those sampled are above the MCL. Look what happened with lead-contaminated drinking water in Flint, Michigan, because the source was changed from lake water (Lake Huron) to the local Flint River, without understanding the chemistry and its corrosion properties. As a result, the water dissolved the inside of the old lead pipes and ended up contaminated the drinking water supply31.
  • Decades of using lead, cadmium, and arsenic based pigments in residential and commercial paint has meant that many of the older homes and buildings still contain these types of paints, which have often been painted over, but still produce dust/particles that can potentially be problematic32. If in doubt, scrape some paint off and get it tested.
  • Some plasterboard used in the construction industry is made from gypsum-based flue gas desulfurization (FGD) waste products mixed with a silicate material known as clinker. FGD is produced by scrubbing particulate emissions from coal-fired power plants, which are notoriously high in heavy metals33.

Final thoughts

The pharmaceutical industry has shown that the only way to reduce elemental impurities is to fully understand all the potential sources of contamination. It took over 20 years to investigate every facet of drug production, including analyzing the raw materials, and active pharmaceutical ingredients, together with the entire manufacturing and packaging process. The US cannabis industry is currently nowhere near this level of knowledge. This is even more disturbing because our insatiable demand for cannabis products is being fulfilled by other parts of the world. This was exemplified in a couple of recent newspaper editorials. One of them highlighted the gross soil contamination produced my metal refineries in many parts of China34. That in itself isn’t surprising, but the other editorial talked about Yunnan Province in southern China, which is now producing CBD-products for the US market35. So the US cannabis and hemp industry must begin to find ways to reduce levels of heavy metal contaminants, otherwise consumers will turn away. If cannabinoid products on the market are considered unsafe to use, it might be too late by the time the FDA comes knocking at the door.

You can read part 3 of this article series from Rob Thomas by clicking here. 


  1. From Laboratory Experiments to Large Scale Application – An Example of the Phytoremediation of Radionuclides, P. Soudek et.al. Advanced Science and Technology for Biological Decontamination of Sites Affected by Chemical and Radiological Nuclear Agents, pp 139-158, 2007.
  2. U.S. Domestic Hemp Production Program, USDA Website; https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/hemp
  3. The Use of Plants for the Removal of Toxic Metals from Contaminated Soil; M. Lasat, AAAS Report, Washington, DC, 2004
  4. Phytoremediation Potential of Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.): Identification and Characterization of Heavy Metals Responsive Genes, R. Ahmad et. al., Volume 44, Issue 2, February 2016, Pages 195-201
  5. A Budding Cannabis Cottage-Industry has set the stage for an Impending Public Health Crisis, Gauvin D.V. et.al., Pharmaceut Reg Affairs Vol 7(1): 199, 2018,
  6. Marijuana Toxicity: Heavy Metal Exposure Through State-Sponsored Access to “la Fee Verte”, D. Gauvin et.al., Pharmaceutical Reg Affairs, 7:1, 2018
  7. Effect of Soil Contamination on Some Heavy Metals Content of Cannabis Sativa, Khan Et.al., J. Chem. Soc. Pak., Vol. 30, No.6, 2008.
  8. Environmental Contamination by Heavy Metals; V. Masindi and K. L. Muedi, http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76082
  9. Arsenic, Cadmium, and Lead in California Cropland Soils: Role of Phosphate and Micronutrient Fertilizers, W. Chen et. al., Journal of Environmental Quality 37(2):689-95, March 2008
  10. Extraction of pharmaceutically active components from plant materials, US Patent Number, US7344736B2, Inventors, B. Whittle,  C. A. Hill, I. R. Flockhart, D. V. Downs, P. Gibson, G. W. Wheatley, GW Pharmaceuticals, 2008
  11. Metal Concentrations in e-Cigarette Liquid and Aerosol Samples: The Contribution of Metallic Coils. P. Olmedo et. al., Environmental Health Perspectives, February, Feb 21;126 (2), 2018.
  12. Rhizosphere engineering: Enhancing sustainable plant ecosystem productivity, A.H. Ahkami et. al., Rhizosphere, Volume 3, Part 2, June 2017, Pages 233-243, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2017.04.012
  13. Back to the Root—The Role of Botany and Plant Physiology in Cannabis Testing, Part I: Understanding Mechanisms of Heavy Metal Uptake in Plants, G. Bode, Cannabis Science and Technology, Vol 3, No 2, March 2020
  14. Heavy Metals in Soils: Trace Metals and Metalloids in Soils and their Bioavailability; Editor, B. J. Alloway, Department of Soil Science, University of Reading, UK; Springer Science, Dordrecht, 2013, ISBN: 978-94-007-4469-1
  15. Single-Particle ICP-MS: A Key Analytical Technique for Characterizing Nanoparticles; C. Stephan, R. Thomas, Spectroscopy Magazine, 32(3) March 2017
  16. Using Biochar for Remediation of Soils Contaminated with Heavy Metals and Organic Pollutants; X Zhang et. al., Environmental Science Pollution Research, DOI 10.1007/s11356-013-1659-0, Springer Verlag, 2013.
  17. The Impact of Illegal Artisanal Gold Mining on the Peruvian Amazon: Benefits of Taking a Direct Mercury Analyzer into the Rain Forest to Monitor Mercury Contamination, R. J. Thomas, AP Column, Spectroscopy Magazine, March, 2019, Volume 34, Issue 2, pg 22–32 http://www.spectroscopyonline.com/impact-illegal-artisanal-gold-mining-peruvian-amazon-benefits-taking-direct-mercury-analyzer-rain-fo
  18. Global mercury emissions from gold and silver mining, L.D. Lacerda, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution volume 97, 209–221, (1997)
  19. Heavy metals and living systems: An overview, R. Singh et. al., Indian J Pharmacol, May-June; 43 (3): 246–253, (2011).
  20. Common Radionuclides found at Superfund Sites, The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), https://www.epa.gov/radiation/which-radionuclides-are-found-superfund-sites
  21. Coal Ash Basics, The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), https://www.epa.gov/coalash
  22. Urban children are playing in toxic dirt, Yvette Cabrera, Think Progress, July 12, 2017, https://thinkprogress.org/urban-children-are-playing-in-toxic-dirt-41961957ff23/
  23. Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS): Clean Air Act, The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), https://www.epa.gov/mats
  24. Chromated copper arsenate–treated wood: a potential source of arsenic exposure and toxicity in dermatology, A. Yuntzu-Yen Chen and T. Olsen, Int. J. Women’s Dermatol., March; 2(1): 28–30, 2016.
  25. Heavy metal pollution from phosphate rock used for the production of fertilizer in Pakistan, T. Mamoud et. al., Microchemical Journal 91(1) · September 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2008.08.009
  26. Role of Nickel in Plant Culture, T. Buechel, October, 2018, Promix Website, https://www.pthorticulture.com/en/training-center/role-of-nickel-in-plant-culture/
  27. Marijuana Growing Forum, https://www.marijuanagrowing.com/showthread.php?27382-Silica-to-increase-the-yield-of-cannabis.
  28. Toxicity of formulants and heavy metals in glyphosate-based herbicides and other pesticides, N. Defarge, J. Spiroux de Vendômoisb, G. E. Séralinia, Toxicology Reports Volume 5, 2018, 56-163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.12.025       
  29. Hexavalent Chromium, The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/hexchrom/default.html.
  30. America’s Clean Water Crisis Goes Far Beyond Flint. There’s No Relief in Sight. J. Moorland, Time Magazine, Feb 20, 2020, https://time.com/longform/clean-water-access-united-states/
  31. Flint Drinking Water Response, EPA Continues to Oversee State and City Action to Protect Public Health, The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), https://www.epa.gov/flint.
  32. Learn about Lead: Factsheet about the hazards of lead paint, The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), https://www.epa.gov/lead/learn-about-lead.
  33. Influence of Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum Amendments on Heavy Metal Distribution in Reclaimed Sodic Soils, Q. Chan et. al., Environ Eng Sci. 2015 Jun 1; 32(6): 470–478., Environ Eng Sci. 2015 Jun 1; 32(6): 470–478.
  34. China: Toxic trails from metal production harms health of poor communities amid soaring global demand for gadgets; G. Shih, Washington Post, January 5, 2020, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/china-toxic-trails-from-metal-production-harms-health-of-poor-communities-amid-soaring-global-demand-for-gadgets
  35. China Cashes in on the Cannabis Boom, New York Times editorial, S. Meyers, May 4, 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/04/world/asia/china-cannabis-cbd.html

Copyright © 2020 From Measuring Heavy Metals Contaminants in Cannabis and Hemp: A Practical Guide by Robert Thomas. Reproduced by permission of Taylor and Francis Group, LLC, a division of Informa plc. 

This material is strictly for non-commercial use only. For any other use, the user must contact Taylor & Francis directly at this address: permissions.mailbox@taylorandfrancis.com. Printing, photocopying, and sharing for commercial purposes is a violation of copyright.

Robert Thomas

Principal of Scientific Solutions

Rob is a heavy metals expert and has written for Analytical Cannabis on the subject since 2019. Through his consulting company Scientific Solutions, he has helped educate countless professionals in the cannabis testing community on heavy metal analysis. He is also an editor and frequent contributor of the Atomic Perspectives column in Spectroscopy magazine, and has authored five textbooks on the principles and applications of mass spectrometry. Rob has an Advanced Degree in Analytical Chemistry from the University of Wales, UK, and is a fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry and a chartered chemist.


Like what you just read? You can find similar content on the topic tag shown below.


Stay connected with the latest news in cannabis extraction, science and testing

Get the latest news with the FREE weekly Analytical Cannabis newsletter